> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeev Suraski [mailto:zeev@zend.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2003 01:47
> To: Ford, Mike [LSS]
>
> At 03:27 25/03/2003, Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
> >I'd love to see, say, case_identical for requesting an ===
> comparison, with
> >case continuing as before to do an == comparison.
>
> I'd really not love to see it :) Use an if-else chain of ===
> comparisons
> instead if that's what you really need.
Oh, well, fair enough -- I can live with that, although I think it's a less
elegant way of programming it. Still, nothing ventured nothing gained...!
;)
Cheers!
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser,
Learning Support Services, Learning & Information Services,
JG125, James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University,
Beckett Park, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Email: m.ford@lmu.ac.uk
Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730 Fax: +44 113 283 3211