Test email; please ignore

php.internals

Andrew Faulds

9 years ago
Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other domain. If this email gets through, the answer is "no".
-- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/

Andrew Faulds

9 years ago
Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet > the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other > domain. > > If this email gets through, the answer is "no".
Is mentioning the wiki in an email body illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it along with my domain. I tried sending a follow-up test email with https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash on_demand_name_mangling It did not get through. So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess.
-- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/

Christoph Becker

9 years ago
On 23.12.2016 at 22:41, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Andrea Faulds wrote: > >> Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet >> the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other >> domain. >> >> If this email gets through, the answer is "no". > > Is mentioning the wiki in an email body illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist > it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it along > with my domain. > > I tried sending a follow-up test email with > > https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash > on_demand_name_mangling > > It did not get through. > > So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess.
I'm afraid that all of php dot net is rejected currently. :-(
-- Christoph M. Becker

Jan Ehrhardt

9 years ago
"Christoph M. Becker" in php.internals (Fri, 23 Dec 2016 23:48:56 +0100):
>On 23.12.2016 at 22:41, Andrea Faulds wrote: > >> https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash >> on_demand_name_mangling >> >> It did not get through. >> >> So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess. > >I'm afraid that all of php dot net is rejected currently. :-(
Any news on this? It is really troublesome for posting and quoting RFC's...
-- Jan

Christoph Becker

9 years ago
On 23.12.2016 at 23:48, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 23.12.2016 at 22:41, Andrea Faulds wrote: > >> Andrea Faulds wrote: >> >>> Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet >>> the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other >>> domain. >>> >>> If this email gets through, the answer is "no". >> >> Is mentioning the wiki in an email body illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist >> it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it along >> with my domain. >> >> I tried sending a follow-up test email with >> >> https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash >> on_demand_name_mangling >> >> It did not get through. >> >> So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess. > > I'm afraid that all of php dot net is rejected currently. :-(
Apparently, this issue has been solved. Testing: <https://wiki.php.net/>.
-- Christoph M. Becker

Ferenc Kovacs

9 years ago
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 23.12.2016 at 23:48, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > > > On 23.12.2016 at 22:41, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > > >> Andrea Faulds wrote: > >> > >>> Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet > >>> the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other > >>> domain. > >>> > >>> If this email gets through, the answer is "no". > >> > >> Is mentioning the wiki in an email body illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist > >> it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it along > >> with my domain. > >> > >> I tried sending a follow-up test email with > >> > >> https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash > >> on_demand_name_mangling > >> > >> It did not get through. > >> > >> So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess. > > > > I'm afraid that all of php dot net is rejected currently. :-( > > Apparently, this issue has been solved. Testing: <https://wiki.php.net/>. > > -- > Christoph M. Becker >
I've restarted ecelerity on lists.php.net after I wasn't able to send out the 5.6.30RC1 announcement emails. I'm not sure if that was the direct cause of the resolution or just a coincidence. I've looked into my emails and they were rejected by ecelerity with sbl_hits=1, I've looked into our ecelerity config and here is the relevant part: Validate validate/omniti_tools url_ripper { base="sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org" max_lookups = 100 forward = true bits [ 0.0.0.2 = "sbl_hits" 0.0.0.4 = "xbl_hits" ] address_headers = "Errors-To:From:Reply-To:Return-Path:Sender" } if anyof( vctx :contains "sbl_hits" "", vctx :contains "xbl_hits" "" # vctx :contains "sc_surbl_hits" "", # vctx :contains "ws_surbl_hits" "", # vctx :contains "ph_surbl_hits" "", # vctx :contains "ob_surbl_hits" "", # vctx :contains "ab_surbl_hits" "", # vctx :contains "jp_surbl_hits" "" ) { if vctx_conn :is "p_esmtp" "true" { ec_tarpit 40 "spam tarpit"; } ec_action 550 text: 5.7.1 mail rejected by policy. SURBL hit Spammy URLs in your message See http://master.php.net/mail/why.php?why=SURBL . "spam:Spammy URLs in message"; stop; } unfortunatelly the validate/omniti_tools is a shared object which has an exposed url_ripper function, but there is no available sourcecode or even documentation what I could find, so I have no idea what does that exactly do (I'm assuming it uses the sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org dns interface, but I don't know how exactly it fetches the links from the message), and couldn't find any of the domains mentioned in my email body on (php.net and github.com) on the blacklist.
-- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

Ferenc Kovacs

9 years ago
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> On 23.12.2016 at 23:48, Christoph M. Becker wrote: >> >> > On 23.12.2016 at 22:41, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> > >> >> Andrea Faulds wrote: >> >> >> >>> Is my website in my signature illegal? SURBL doesn't blacklist it, yet >> >>> the news server rejected a previous email containing it and one other >> >>> domain. >> >>> >> >>> If this email gets through, the answer is "no". >> >> >> >> Is mentioning the wiki in an email body illegal? SURBL doesn't >> blacklist >> >> it, yet the news server rejected a previous email containing it along >> >> with my domain. >> >> >> >> I tried sending a follow-up test email with >> >> >> >> https colon slash slash wiki dot php dot net slash rfc slash >> >> on_demand_name_mangling >> >> >> >> It did not get through. >> >> >> >> So, wiki dot php dot net is the issue, I guess. >> > >> > I'm afraid that all of php dot net is rejected currently. :-( >> >> Apparently, this issue has been solved. Testing: <https://wiki.php.net/ >> >. >> >> -- >> Christoph M. Becker >> > > I've restarted ecelerity on lists.php.net after I wasn't able to send out > the 5.6.30RC1 announcement emails. > I'm not sure if that was the direct cause of the resolution or just a > coincidence. > I've looked into my emails and they were rejected by ecelerity with > sbl_hits=1, I've looked into our ecelerity config and here is the relevant > part: > > Validate validate/omniti_tools url_ripper { > base="sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org" > max_lookups = 100 > forward = true > bits [ > 0.0.0.2 = "sbl_hits" > 0.0.0.4 = "xbl_hits" > ] > address_headers = "Errors-To:From:Reply-To:Return-Path:Sender" > } > > > if anyof( > vctx :contains "sbl_hits" "", > vctx :contains "xbl_hits" "" > # vctx :contains "sc_surbl_hits" "", > # vctx :contains "ws_surbl_hits" "", > # vctx :contains "ph_surbl_hits" "", > # vctx :contains "ob_surbl_hits" "", > # vctx :contains "ab_surbl_hits" "", > # vctx :contains "jp_surbl_hits" "" > ) { > > if vctx_conn :is "p_esmtp" "true" { > ec_tarpit 40 "spam tarpit"; > } > ec_action 550 text: > 5.7.1 mail rejected by policy. SURBL hit > Spammy URLs in your message > See http://master.php.net/mail/why.php?why=SURBL > . > "spam:Spammy URLs in message"; > stop; > } > > unfortunatelly the validate/omniti_tools is a shared object which has an > exposed url_ripper function, but there is no available sourcecode or even > documentation what I could find, so I have no idea what does that exactly > do (I'm assuming it uses the sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org dns interface, but I > don't know how exactly it fetches the links from the message), and couldn't > find any of the domains mentioned in my email body on (php.net and > github.com) on the blacklist. > > -- > Ferenc Kovács > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >
and I wanted to mention that we should really-really move away from ecelerity it is a closed source product, which we have an old unsupported version on lists.php.net (from the version number it seems it can be even a custom built one by wez) and nobody else but Wez is familiar with it, who is rarely around the php project anymore, so would be nice replacing this one with postfix as we(Sascha mostly) did it for the php.net MX
-- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu