Everything

php

http://php.net/usage.php

php.internals

Stas Malyshev

9 years ago

Hi!

With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
(or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)

--
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com

Alice Wonder

9 years ago

On 01/08/2017 03:51 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

> Hi!
>
> With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
> (or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
> http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)
>

Oh wow yeah, that IMHO needs to go.

I've never been fond of those kind of statistics anyway, often the
popular product is the product that puts money into marketing and isn't
really any better (sometimes far worse) than the competition quality-
and security-wise.

PHP at this point is extremely well established as an enterprise capable
server-side scripting language.

Christoph Becker

9 years ago

On 09.01.2017 at 00:51, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:

> With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
> (or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
> http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)

I can't see any particular value in this page, so I'm +1 on removing it.

--
Christoph M. Becker

Kalle Sommer Nielsen

9 years ago

2017-01-09 2:18 GMT+01:00 Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>:

> On 09.01.2017 at 00:51, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>
>> With all this wonderful new year's work going on, should we also update
>> (or remove, if we don't want to update it anymore)
>> http://php.net/usage.php ? With data from 2013 it looks kind of pathetic :)
>
> I can't see any particular value in this page, so I'm +1 on removing it.

Removed in 3abb7f2da6f2806a28cd272b13cd36fe81f8c882. I intentionally
left the graph image there.

--
regards,

Kalle Sommer Nielsen
kalle@php.net