Am 29.03.17 um 12:52 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
> On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote:
>
>> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports targeting
>>
>> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many years -
>>
>> such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any objections
>>
>> if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I know Kalle
>>
>> has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the unlikeliness
>>
>> of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug
>>
>> reports lying around in the bugs DB.
From my POV I'd only ask for a "template-comment" along the line of "As
the extension isn't maintained since <inser year> there won't be a fix
for this issue. We're therefore closing it now."
Apart from that I'm fine with it :)
My 0.02€
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://hei.gl/root-ca |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+