Bug Reports Targeting Ancient PECL Extensions

php.internals

Thomas Punt

9 years ago
Hi internals! There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports targeting PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many years - such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any objections if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I know Kalle has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the unlikeliness of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug reports lying around in the bugs DB. Thanks, Tom [1]: https://pecl.php.net/package/sam <https://pecl.php.net/package/sam> [2]: https://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&package_name%5B%5D=sam

Christoph Becker

9 years ago
On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports targeting > > PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many years - > > such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any objections > > if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I know Kalle > > has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the unlikeliness > > of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug > > reports lying around in the bugs DB. > > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > [1]: https://pecl.php.net/package/sam > > <https://pecl.php.net/package/sam> > > [2]: https://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&package_name%5B%5D=sam
See also the related discussion from January: <http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&w=2&r=2&s=bugsnet+cleanup&q=b>.
-- Christoph M. Becker

Andreas Heigl

9 years ago
Am 29.03.17 um 12:52 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
> On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote: > >> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports targeting >> >> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many years - >> >> such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any objections >> >> if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I know Kalle >> >> has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the unlikeliness >> >> of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug >> >> reports lying around in the bugs DB.
From my POV I'd only ask for a "template-comment" along the line of "As the extension isn't maintained since <inser year> there won't be a fix for this issue. We're therefore closing it now." Apart from that I'm fine with it :) My 0.02€ Cheers Andreas
-- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://hei.gl/root-ca | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+