Big_Endian problem

php.internals

Sam Ding

8 years ago
Hi all, The test case ext/standard/tests/general_functions/bug72300.phpt is failed on s390x. The function "ignore_user_abort" returns "256" on s390x, and "1" on x86_64 after "ignore_user_abort" is set to true; The root reason is because of Big_Endian on s390x. Here is the C code: ext/standard/basic_functions.c b/ext/standard/basic_functions.c:5641 old_setting = (unsigned short)PG(ignore_user_abort); // php_core_globals.ignore_user_abort, "x /2b" shows its value : "0x01 0x00" on both platforms Does PHP interpreter support Big_Endian? Are there any existing macros/functions to deal with Big/Little Endian? Thanks, Sam Ding

Sara Golemon

8 years ago
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Sam Ding <samding@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> The test case ext/standard/tests/general_functions/bug72300.phpt is failed > on s390x. > The function "ignore_user_abort" returns "256" on s390x, and "1" on x86_64 > after "ignore_user_abort" is set to true; > The root reason is because of Big_Endian on s390x. > Here is the C code: ext/standard/basic_functions.c > b/ext/standard/basic_functions.c:5641 > > old_setting = (unsigned short)PG(ignore_user_abort); > // php_core_globals.ignore_user_abort, "x /2b" shows its > value : "0x01 0x00" on both platforms >
That specific line isn't the problem, as it's just cashing a short to an unsigned short, which is legal and not problematic for any endianness. The actual problem is that PG(ignore_user_abort) is declared as a short, but its INI handler method is defined as OnUpdateBool (which of course, only operates on a single byte).
> Does PHP interpreter support Big_Endian? Are there any existing > macros/functions to deal with Big/Little Endian? >
Yep. And if things break on s390x, please let us know! I'll put together a fix for this over the weekend and apply it to 7.0 and later versions. -Sara

Sam Ding

8 years ago
Thank Sara. Yes, on s390x, it is broken. The function "ignore_user_abort" returns "256" on s390x, and "1" on x86_64 after "ignore_user_abort" is set to true; Please let me know when you finished code changes on v7.2.1. I will test on s390x. Thanks, Sam php@golemon.com wrote on 01/19/2018 05:07:25 PM:
> From: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> > To: Sam Ding <samding@ca.ibm.com> > Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net> > Date: 01/19/2018 05:07 PM > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Big_Endian problem > Sent by: php@golemon.com > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Sam Ding <samding@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > > The test case ext/standard/tests/general_functions/bug72300.phpt is
failed
> > on s390x. > > The function "ignore_user_abort" returns "256" on s390x, and "1" on
x86_64
> > after "ignore_user_abort" is set to true; > > The root reason is because of Big_Endian on s390x. > > Here is the C code: ext/standard/basic_functions.c > > b/ext/standard/basic_functions.c:5641 > > > > old_setting = (unsigned short)PG(ignore_user_abort); > > // php_core_globals.ignore_user_abort, "x /2b" shows
its

Sara Golemon

8 years ago
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Sam Ding <samding@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Yes, on s390x, it is broken. >
Yeah, I'd confirmed that one. I meant any *additional* issues are welcome as well. :D
> The function "ignore_user_abort" returns "256" on s390x, and "1" on x86_64 > after "ignore_user_abort" is set to true; > > Please let me know when you finished code changes on v7.2.1. I will test on > s390x. >
Just got around to pushing: https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/d46d53a7bcc99bb8d993852ef84e7a83d703f3db Thanks! -Sara