Insofar as conversation started what do you think about CI service that supports big endian platform?On Feb 2, 2019 15:09, "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On 02.02.2019 at 14:31, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:06 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 02.02.2019 at 13:18, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just learned about the Azure Pipelines (
> >>> https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/pipelines/) offering,
> >>> which offers open source projects 10 parallel builds with unlimited
> >>> minutes. Assuming there's no other catch here, it might be worthwhile to
> >>> migrate our Windows CI jobs to Azure Pipelines.
> >>
> >> An alternative to consider is using Travis for Windows CI[1], too.
> >
> > It's an option, but I think we're generally better off using multiple CI
> > platforms to increase the number of parallel builds we get.
> >
> > Next to the builds we already have, I think it would be very good to also
> > have a macos builder (this is supported by both Travis and Azure Pipelines,
> > but needs someone familiar with the platform to set things up) and a 32-bit
> > builder (probably a -m32 build on x86_64 Linux). That would bring us to a
> > total of six builds, which would probably make the Travis queue somewhat
> > slow if we used it exclusively.
>
> Ah, makes perfect sense (a FreeBSD CI would be nice as well).
>
> Regarding the execution time of the test suite, it might be sensible to
> also have a look at PR #2822[1] and/or PFTT2[2].
>
> [1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2822>
> [2] <https://git.php.net/?p=pftt2.git>
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
