Everything

php

[VOTE] Object Initializer

php.internals

Michał Brzuchalski

6 years ago

Hi all,

the discussion period was long and discussion I think quite comprehensive.

The RFC is at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object-initializer and is up for
voting now.
The voting will take 2 weeks from 11:00 UTC 7th till 11:00 UTC 21st of
October 2019.

BR,
Michał Brzuchalski

Michał Brzuchalski

6 years ago

Hi all,

A follow-up note.
There is no implementation of a patch yet.

BR,
Michał Brzuchalski

pon., 7 paź 2019 o 13:00 Michał Brzuchalski <michal@brzuchalski.com>
napisał(a):

> Hi all,
>
> the discussion period was long and discussion I think quite comprehensive.
>
> The RFC is at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object-initializer and is up for
> voting now.
> The voting will take 2 weeks from 11:00 UTC 7th till 11:00 UTC 21st of
> October 2019.
>
> BR,
> Michał Brzuchalski
>

--
regards / pozdrawiam,
--
Michał Brzuchalski
about.me/brzuchal
brzuchalski.com

Marco Pivetta

6 years ago

Hey Michal,

Overall, I like the idea of simplifying constructors. I downvoted the RFC
because:

* I don't like/want co-existence of ctor and initializer
* `__set` interactions seem to also be a lot of non-trivial added
complexity.

If this was a short-hand for a constructor replacement (exposed in the same
way downstream and in reflection) I'd totally be for it, but as it is it
blurs the entire class definition by a lot, making things very difficult to
anything reflection-ish based.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 13:18 Michał Brzuchalski <michal@brzuchalski.com>
wrote:

Michał Brzuchalski

6 years ago

Hi Marco,

pon., 7 paź 2019 o 13:24 Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> napisał(a):

> Hey Michal,
>
> Overall, I like the idea of simplifying constructors. I downvoted the RFC
> because:
>
>  * I don't like/want co-existence of ctor and initializer
>  * `__set` interactions seem to also be a lot of non-trivial added
> complexity.
>
> If this was a short-hand for a constructor replacement (exposed in the same
> way downstream and in reflection) I'd totally be for it, but as it is it
> blurs the entire class definition by a lot, making things very difficult to
> anything reflection-ish based.
>

Thank you for your feedback.

Cheers,
Michał Brzuchalski

Michał Brzuchalski

6 years ago

Hi all,

I've closed the vote. Object Initializer RFC failed with 26 votes against
and only 3 in favour.
The second vote has a meaning only for future revive of this feature.
The majority decided that the preferred assign token should be eq "=".

Thanks to all for taking a vote.

Cheers,
Michał Brzuchalski

pon., 7 paź 2019 o 13:00 Michał Brzuchalski <michal@brzuchalski.com>
napisał(a):

Brent

6 years ago

Hi Michał

I can't help but wonder: why did you start the vote to begin with? It seemed to me that, based on the discussion feedback, it would never pass in its current form.

Kind regards
Brent