Everything

php

Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

php.internals

Andrey Hristov

22 years ago

Hi,
so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes nowhere,
only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed. Is it ok, to
branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes will go to
PHP5_0 and HEAD. I know that this way we will have 3 branches but hopefully
there will be nothing after 4.3.5 (which is iin RC phase now).
So which is better? To have the branch made in the next week or when 4.3.5 is
released? Or not branching after 5.0.0 is released which nobody knows when it will be done :)


Andrey

Edin Kadribasic

22 years ago

I think its way too early for that. PHP_5_0 branch should IMHO be created
after php-5.0.0 has been released at the earliest.

Edin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Hristov" <php@hristov.com>
To: <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Brachning PHP5_0 from HEAD

Hi,
so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes
nowhere,
only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed. Is
it ok, to
branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes will
go to
PHP5_0 and HEAD. I know that this way we will have 3 branches but hopefully
there will be nothing after 4.3.5 (which is iin RC phase now).
So which is better? To have the branch made in the next week or when 4.3.5
is
released? Or not branching after 5.0.0 is released which nobody knows when
it will be done :)

Andrey

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Andi Gutmans

22 years ago

At 01:18 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:

>Hi,
>so PHP5 (currenlty HEAD) is feature freezed and therefore new code goes
>nowhere,
>only bugfixes go to php-src module since PHP_4_3 is also feature freezed.
>Is it ok, to
>branch PHP5_0 from HEAD so new developments to go to HEAD and bugfixes
>will go to
>PHP5_0 and HEAD. I know that this way we will have 3 branches but hopefully
>there will be nothing after 4.3.5 (which is iin RC phase now).
>So which is better? To have the branch made in the next week or when 4.3.5 is
>released? Or not branching after 5.0.0 is released which nobody knows when
>it will be done :)

I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then
know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes
going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
What change do you want to make. If it's minor I think we can make an
exception.

Andi

Andrey Hristov

22 years ago

Hi,
Andi Gutmans wrote:

> At 01:18 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Andrey Hristov wrote:
>
>
> I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we
> then know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor
> changes going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
> What change do you want to make. If it's minor I think we can make an
> exception.

It's a general question. I have nothing in mind except in_array_all() but
the thread died with no decision whether it's a good addition or not. Also
Lucas remembered me about his array_merger_clobber which can be better named
array_merge_recursive_overwrite() (according to Derick this name is quite long).
Also I have some ideas for I think 2 new array functions, which I would like to implement
first and then to decide whether to propose or not. But they are in the future after
Janurary 20th, when I will have more spare time.

Andrey

Derick Rethans

22 years ago

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:

> I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch.

That's how we usually do it too, and I agree that that would be the best
point to branch.

Derick

Andrei Zmievski

22 years ago

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:

> I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then
> know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes
> going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
> What change do you want to make. If it's minor I think we can make an
> exception.

I'd rather not have new-features branch at all. Let's keep the new
development on HEAD.

- Andrei

Rasmus Lerdorf

22 years ago

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andrei Zmievski wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we then
> > know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes
> > going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
> > What change do you want to make. If it's minor I think we can make an
> > exception.
>
> I'd rather not have new-features branch at all. Let's keep the new
> development on HEAD.

Right, I think we are all in agreement on that.  Branch for releases,
develop on HEAD.

-Rasmus

Andi Gutmans

22 years ago

At 08:34 AM 1/14/2004 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > > I prefer waiting for RC1 to start a new-features branch. At least we
> then
> > > know that we're on the right track. There are still some minor changes
> > > going on (besides bug fixes) in tidy and SimpleXML.
> > > What change do you want to make. If it's minor I think we can make an
> > > exception.
> >
> > I'd rather not have new-features branch at all. Let's keep the new
> > development on HEAD.
>
>Right, I think we are all in agreement on that.  Branch for releases,
>develop on HEAD.

I agree too. I meant we shouldn't branch before RC1 or later.
I realize I misexplained myself.

Andi

Andrei Zmievski

22 years ago

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:

> I agree too. I meant we shouldn't branch before RC1 or later.

Of course not. Branch right after PHP 5.0.0 golden goes out the door.

- Andrei

Andi Gutmans

22 years ago

At 01:30 PM 1/14/2004 +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote:

>I think its way too early for that. PHP_5_0 branch should IMHO be created
>after php-5.0.0 has been released at the earliest.

Even better, but RC1 is a bare minimum IMO.

Andi