No safe_pemalloc()?

php.internals

Sara Golemon

22 years ago
Is there any reason there's no safe_pemalloc()? -Sara

Moriyoshi Koizumi

22 years ago
On 2004/07/20, at 14:10, Sara Golemon wrote:
> Is there any reason there's no safe_pemalloc()?
I once had exactly the same thought. Probably because there'd be no need for persistence, and stream folks now obviously need it :) Moriyoshi

Zeev Suraski

22 years ago
At 16:26 20/07/2004, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>On 2004/07/20, at 14:10, Sara Golemon wrote: > >>Is there any reason there's no safe_pemalloc()? > >I once had exactly the same thought. Probably because there'd be no need >for persistence, and stream folks now obviously need it :)
Yep, no special reason - let's add it... Zeev

Moriyoshi Koizumi

22 years ago
Here's the patch. I'm going to commit this soon. Moriyoshi Index: Zend/zend_alloc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_alloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.138 diff -u -r1.138 zend_alloc.c --- Zend/zend_alloc.c 15 Jul 2004 22:59:54 -0000 1.138 +++ Zend/zend_alloc.c 20 Jul 2004 20:24:40 -0000 @@ -241,6 +241,30 @@ return 0; } +ZEND_API void *_safe_p_malloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size, size_t offset) +{ + + if (nmemb < LONG_MAX + && size < LONG_MAX + && offset < LONG_MAX + && nmemb >= 0 + && size >= 0 + && offset >= 0) { + long lval; + double dval; + int use_dval; + + ZEND_SIGNED_MULTIPLY_LONG(nmemb, size, lval, dval, use_dval); + + if (!use_dval + && lval < (long) (LONG_MAX - offset)) { + return pemalloc(lval + offset, 1); + } + } + + zend_error(E_ERROR, "Possible integer overflow in memory allocation (%zd * %zd + %zd)", nmemb, size, offset); + return 0; +} ZEND_API void _efree(void *ptr ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC) Index: Zend/zend_alloc.h =================================================================== RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_alloc.h,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -r1.54 zend_alloc.h --- Zend/zend_alloc.h 19 Jul 2004 07:19:01 -0000 1.54 +++ Zend/zend_alloc.h 20 Jul 2004 20:24:40 -0000 @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ ZEND_API void *_emalloc(size_t size ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC) ZEND_ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC; ZEND_API void *_safe_emalloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size, size_t offset ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC) ZEND_ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC; +ZEND_API void *_safe_p_malloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size, size_t offset) ZEND_ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC; ZEND_API void _efree(void *ptr ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC); ZEND_API void *_ecalloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC) ZEND_ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC; ZEND_API void *_erealloc(void *ptr, size_t size, int allow_failure ZEND_FILE_LINE_DC ZEND_FILE_LINE_ORIG_DC); @@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ /* Selective persistent/non persistent allocation macros */ #define pemalloc(size, persistent) ((persistent)?malloc(size):emalloc(size)) +#define safe_pemalloc(nmemb, size, offset, persistent) ((persistent)?_safe_p_malloc(nmemb, size, offset):safe_emalloc(nmemb, size, offset)) #define pefree(ptr, persistent) ((persistent)?free(ptr):efree(ptr)) #define pecalloc(nmemb, size, persistent) ((persistent)?calloc((nmemb), (size)):ecalloc((nmemb), (size))) #define perealloc(ptr, size, persistent) ((persistent)?realloc((ptr), (size)):erealloc((ptr), (size))) On 2004/07/21, at 0:57, Zeev Suraski wrote:

Andi Gutmans

22 years ago
Looks good but why not rename the function to _safe_pemalloc()? (And of course rename to safe_pemalloc() as you do later on. At 05:26 AM 7/21/2004 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:

Moriyoshi Koizumi

22 years ago
On 2004/07/21, at 6:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Looks good but why not rename the function to _safe_pemalloc()? (And > of course rename to safe_pemalloc() as you do later on.
Because it's there just for persistent allocation, while pemalloc() can be used both ways. Moriyoshi

Andi Gutmans

22 years ago
Oh I see. So maybe you should just call it safe_malloc() or it'll be too confusing :) At 06:28 AM 7/21/2004 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote: