Okay, i will, thanx :)
"Jeremy Johnstone" <jsjohnst@altdns.net> wrote in message
news:200408081902.11016.jsjohnst@altdns.net...
> Just to note, although prior versions of ZS were very slow (especially in
> Win32), that doesn't mean the current version is (that review you linked
was
> reviewing a year+ old version). I recently upgraded to the latest edition
> (3.5.1) and can say the speed has improved immensely where there is no
> noticeable delay anywhere in the program. I haven't tested it much on
Win32
> (I use Linux by choice), but it even seems to be much faster there as
well. I
> would check it out if I were you.
>
> -Jeremy
>
> On Sunday 08 August 2004 05:16 pm, Ron Korving wrote:
> > ok, i guess this is where my newbieness comes in..
> > i'm sorry, ignore this whole post :)
> >
> > ron
> >
> > "Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:4e89b42604080811586b78e318@mail.gmail.com...
> >
> > > Err, we didn't write it, try talking to Zend...
> > >
> > > --Wez.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 20:55:00 +0200, Ron Korving <r.korving@xit.nl>
wrote:
> > > > hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > if you read the reviews on this page:
> > > > http://www.php-editors.com/review/?editor=16 , you will notice that
a
> >
> > lot
> >
> > > > of people don't use zend studio for the simple reason that it's
lacking
> >
> > in
> >
> > > > performance... this includes myself.
> > > >
> > > > i would really love to use it because of all the features, but when
i
> >
> > use
> >
> > > > the gui, i want the program to respond instantly, which it doesn't
> > > > do... it's easy to blame java for this, but on the other hand, a
> > > > program such
> >
> > as
> >
> > > > azureus ( http://azureus.sourceforge.net ) seems to perform
better...
