Re: PHP 5.1 roadmap

php.internals

Frank M. Kromann

21 years ago
> Aside from that, PDO is very usable for the most common data access > patterns that you are likely to use in PHP. > > Driver wise, we have a nice collection. The only major driver that we > are missing is mysql 4.x (we have 3.x).
The FBSQL driver is almost done, and when that happens Iøll start on MSSQL/TDS. - Frank

George Schlossnagle

21 years ago
On Oct 21, 2004, at 7:30 PM, Frank M. Kromann wrote:
>> Aside from that, PDO is very usable for the most common data access >> patterns that you are likely to use in PHP. >> >> Driver wise, we have a nice collection. The only major driver that we >> are missing is mysql 4.x (we have 3.x).
If namesake-Georg doesn't get to it in the next 3 weeks, I'll probably take a whack at mysql 4.x driver in the second week of November. George

Georg Richter

21 years ago
Am Fr, den 22.10.2004 schrieb George Schlossnagle um 4:24: Aloha namesake!
> If namesake-Georg doesn't get to it in the next 3 weeks, I'll probably > take a whack at mysql 4.x driver in the second week of November. >
I will be definetly be able to write this driver within the next 3 weeks. Beside the usual "overworked" reason, it's mainly the reason, that pdo has several lacks. Against the common consent from LinuxTag in June (on a meeting where most of the db maintainers participated) , Wez started the implementation without notifying anyone. I would be able to summarize within the next 3 weeks what is missing or bad in pdo (and even that will need some discussion) - I will definetly not be able to code mysqli support for a thing, in which I don't believe. /Georg
-- Georg Richter, Senior Software Developer MySQL AB, www.mysql.com See you at MySQL ComCon Europe November 8-10! www.mysqlcomconeurope.com

Wez Furlong

21 years ago
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:23:29 +0200, Georg Richter <georg@mysql.com> wrote:
> I will be definetly be able to write this driver within the next 3 > weeks. Beside the usual "overworked" reason, it's mainly the reason, > that pdo has several lacks.
I'm all ears.
> Against the common consent from LinuxTag in June (on a meeting where > most of the db maintainers participated) , Wez started the > implementation without notifying anyone.
Eh? PDO has been in CVS since May, and Marcus has had code around since a long time before then.
> I would be able to summarize within the next 3 weeks what is missing or > bad in pdo (and even that will need some discussion) - I will definetly > not be able to code mysqli support for a thing, in which I don't > believe.
Again, I'm all ears; I haven't heard anything from you until now, and it's sad that you seem to already have a negative opinion. --Wez.

Steph

21 years ago
Georg, I have to back Wez up over this. I was 'around' for the LT discussions both last year and this year, and I know exactly when PDO reached PECL CVS. What happened here? - Steph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> To: "Georg Richter" <georg@mysql.com> Cc: "George Schlossnagle" <george@omniti.com>; "Frank M. Kromann" <frank@kromann.info>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>; "Andi Gutmans" <andi@zend.com> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:50 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 roadmap

Lukas Smith

21 years ago
Georg Richter wrote:
> I will be definetly be able to write this driver within the next 3 > weeks. Beside the usual "overworked" reason, it's mainly the reason, > that pdo has several lacks. > > Against the common consent from LinuxTag in June (on a meeting where > most of the db maintainers participated) , Wez started the > implementation without notifying anyone. > > I would be able to summarize within the next 3 weeks what is missing or > bad in pdo (and even that will need some discussion) - I will definetly > not be able to code mysqli support for a thing, in which I don't > believe.
I suggest that for the php conference everybody should try to make a list of any issues they think are open in pdo. This will give us the opportunity to talk about them. Hopefully we can integrate Wez (as well as anyone else not physically present at php conf) somehow into our discussions using IRC/Skype. It would also be great if any (un)written plans for pdo could be made available for this meeting. Wez, if possible, could you make sure that the guys interested in documenting pdo get the heads up that it would be a huge help if they could get something up until php conf? regards, Lukas

Andi Gutmans

21 years ago
Hi Georg, I'm surprised at your email as the main design of PDO has been clear for sometime, although I think lacking documentation has led to it being too hard to understand *exactly* how it works (functionality wise), especially the DB specific functionality. (no not trying to hint about the docs again but phpDocGen is nice :) I read through some of the source code and it's not that easy to puzzle the interface together from that, although Wez's PDO presentation and OTN articles give a very good overview of it. Anyway, I think in all fairness to the guys who worked on PDO, try and explain your problems as soon as possible. Andi