Win9x support in PHP

php.internals

Wez Furlong

21 years ago
How many people are seriously using Win9x with PHP? There are quite a few APIs that are either server-only or Win2k and up that PHP would benefit from using. Before we just go ahead and use them (breaking support for Win9x) I thought it would be a good idea to find out how many people this will affect. So, if you use, or know of someone that uses PHP on Win95, Win98 or WinME, please add a comment to my blog [1] (so that we don't spam the mailing lists with it) explaining why, so we can guage how much of an impact bumping the version requirements for PHP would have. Thanks! --Wez [1] http://netevil.org/node.php?uuid=42d7a64c-ffb7-0029-3508-2d7a64c62bef

Derick Rethans

21 years ago
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
> How many people are seriously using Win9x with PHP? > > There are quite a few APIs that are either server-only or Win2k and up > that PHP would benefit from using. Before we just go ahead and use > them (breaking support for Win9x) I thought it would be a good idea to > find out how many people this will affect. > > So, if you use, or know of someone that uses PHP on Win95, Win98 or > WinME, please add a comment to my blog [1] (so that we don't spam the > mailing lists with it) explaining why, so we can guage how much of an > impact bumping the version requirements for PHP would have.
WIn95 Support was already dropped some time ago, wasn't it? Derick
-- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org

Nuno Lopes

21 years ago
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Wez Furlong wrote: > >> How many people are seriously using Win9x with PHP? >> >> There are quite a few APIs that are either server-only or Win2k and up >> that PHP would benefit from using. Before we just go ahead and use >> them (breaking support for Win9x) I thought it would be a good idea to >> find out how many people this will affect. >> >> So, if you use, or know of someone that uses PHP on Win95, Win98 or >> WinME, please add a comment to my blog [1] (so that we don't spam the >> mailing lists with it) explaining why, so we can guage how much of an >> impact bumping the version requirements for PHP would have. > > WIn95 Support was already dropped some time ago, wasn't it? > > Derick
Yep: Version 5.0.0 Beta 3 (21-Dec-2003) - Dropped Windows 95 support. (Andi) Nuno

Edin Kadribasic

21 years ago
On Friday 15 July 2005 14:28, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > WIn95 Support was already dropped some time ago, wasn't it? > > > > Derick > > Yep: > > Version 5.0.0 Beta 3 (21-Dec-2003) > - Dropped Windows 95 support. (Andi)
Windows 98, ME and NT are still supported. I guess Wez was asking if we should make Windows 2000 minimum requirement, which I think we should. Edin

Zeev Suraski

21 years ago
At 15:07 15/07/2005, Wez Furlong wrote:
>How many people are seriously using Win9x with PHP? > >There are quite a few APIs that are either server-only or Win2k and up >that PHP would benefit from using. Before we just go ahead and use >them (breaking support for Win9x) I thought it would be a good idea to >find out how many people this will affect. > >So, if you use, or know of someone that uses PHP on Win95, Win98 or >WinME, please add a comment to my blog [1] (so that we don't spam the >mailing lists with it) explaining why, so we can guage how much of an >impact bumping the version requirements for PHP would have.
My 2c is that I haven't seen any Win9x user using PHP for the past 3 or 4 years (that's one cent), and that the Zend range of products that supports Windows (including Studio, Optimizer and WinEnabler) requires Windows 2000 at minimum (even NT is not supported), and I don't recall a single complaint about it in the last 2 years (the 2nd cent). I'd say go for it. Zeev

Steph

21 years ago
My 2p: I used to build regularly on Win98 until last summer, and supplied fixes for a couple of platform-specific PHP bugs and build issues up until that point. Nobody else on the internals circuit had access to Win98 then, and nobody's actively supported it since I stopped. The test suite has never worked (something to do with the way pipes aren't used AFAICR) which means that any bugfixing there is totally reliant on external bug reports. I no longer have access to Win98 on a regular basis, and the available evidence suggests that most PHP users don't either. A brief search in the bugs db reveals just two open reports, both dating from last summer - one is really an IE 6.0 report about talks.php.net and the other's a PHP-GTK report about encoding. Neither are remotely relevant to PHP per se. There's only ONE bug report open for NT (actually for NT 4) - against what is now pecl/printer, and dated 1993. So yep - I'd say go for it, too. - Steph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> To: "Wez Furlong" <kingwez@gmail.com> Cc: "PHPdev" <internals@lists.php.net> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Win9x support in PHP