Everything

php

Coverity report

php.internals

Nuno Lopes

20 years ago

Hi,

Has anyone already received the Coverity report (http://scan.coverity.com)?
I've already asked for a password, but I haven't received it yet.
I would like to take a look at it and help to fix the 42 detected bugs.

Nuno

Antony Dovgal

20 years ago

On 05.04.2006 01:40, Nuno Lopes wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Has anyone already received the Coverity report (http://scan.coverity.com)?

Lot of people did.
Including me =)

> I've already asked for a password, but I haven't received it yet.

It takes some time - requests are human-filtered.
In my case it took about a day or two.

> I would like to take a look at it and help to fix the 42 detected bugs.

s/bugs/pieces of code that Coverity doesn't like/

--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal

Nuno Lopes

20 years ago

> On 05.04.2006 01:40, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has anyone already received the Coverity report
>> (http://scan.coverity.com)?
>
> Lot of people did.
> Including me =)

and did anyone found a bug by reading Coverity's report? I didn't noticed
unusual commits...

>> I've already asked for a password, but I haven't received it yet.
>
> It takes some time - requests are human-filtered.
> In my case it took about a day or two.

Steph told me she received her password in a matter of hours. I'm waiting
for two days, though :)

>> I would like to take a look at it and help to fix the 42 detected bugs.
>
> s/bugs/pieces of code that Coverity doesn't like/

yes, of course. I bet most are just false positives.

Nuno

Antony Dovgal

20 years ago

On 05.04.2006 02:56, Nuno Lopes wrote:

>> On 05.04.2006 01:40, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Has anyone already received the Coverity report
>>> (http://scan.coverity.com)?
>>
>> Lot of people did.
>> Including me =)
>
> and did anyone found a bug by reading Coverity's report? I didn't noticed
> unusual commits...

I did fix a couple of potential problems like dereferencing a pointer and then checking it for NULL.
Not sure if they could lead to real bugs, though they looked valid to me.

>>> I would like to take a look at it and help to fix the 42 detected bugs.
>>
>> s/bugs/pieces of code that Coverity doesn't like/
>
> yes, of course. I bet most are just false positives.

That's why there are now only 42 defects comparing to initial 204 =)

--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal

Antony Dovgal

20 years ago

On 05.04.2006 02:56, Nuno Lopes wrote:

>>> I've already asked for a password, but I haven't received it yet.
>>
>> It takes some time - requests are human-filtered.
>> In my case it took about a day or two.
>
> Steph told me she received her password in a matter of hours. I'm waiting
> for two days, though :)

So, did you manage to get the account?

--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal

Nuno Lopes

20 years ago

> On 05.04.2006 02:56, Nuno Lopes wrote:
>>>> I've already asked for a password, but I haven't received it yet.
>>>
>>> It takes some time - requests are human-filtered.
>>> In my case it took about a day or two.
>>
>> Steph told me she received her password in a matter of hours. I'm waiting
>> for two days, though :)
>
> So, did you manage to get the account?

Thanks for asking, but no, I haven't received it yet.

Nuno

Michael Vergoz

20 years ago

Hi,

I am waiting it too since 1 month :s

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nuno Lopes" <nlopess@php.net>
To: "Antony Dovgal" <antony@zend.com>
Cc: "PHPdev" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Coverity report