Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> The discussion is on how and what we count, not on whether to count or not.
The quoted discussion is/was , this one is about the possibility to get
16M without counting.
> If you count in 256KB increments instead of in byte increments then there's
> less counting to do in order to get to 16MB :)
Is the hardcoded 8M counting that way ?
( I mean , without --enable-memory-limit )
--
toggg