On 10/08/2006 04:26 AM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
> Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>>> Now that we know that there is going to be RC6 I think there is no
>>> point in waiting for another week for it just because we have to
>>> release things on Thursday.
>>>
>>> I think that the best thing would be to make immediate RC6 and allow
>>> people some time to test it, and if nothing critical comes up, release
>>> the final version in a week or so.
>>
>> Many people haven't had a chance to look at RC5 yet. I think cycling
>> through them too fast is going to frustrate people. Give them a couple
>> of days to report other issues before going to RC6.
>
> Having to wait a week while there is another RC and allowing commits in
> the meanwhile, any of which can break things, is not the best release
> management from my perspective.
I tend to disagree with you here, Edin.
Releasing one RC just after another - _that_ would be bad management.
RCs are RCs, if something is broken in one of them, let's wait for the next one and see if it ok.
Also, I don't like the rush in the release management which to appears from time to
time, but this time (I mean 5.2) something (or someone) has changed and I really like how it goes,
so let's make it as stable as we can and push it out of the door without any hurry.
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal