Everything
php
Learn Community Releases The PHP Project
Home » Project » Newsgroups » php.internals » include_once »

include_once

php.internals

Reinis Rozitis

19 years ago
Hello, just a quick question - will the include_once() (Optimized require_once() and include_once() by eliminating fopen(3) on second usage. (Dmitry)) optimisation fix in 5.2.0 backported also in PHP 4 tree (in 4.4.5 maybe?) Theoretically speaking (havent checked the default funcs internal changes between 4.x and 5.2) could it be possible to patch 4.x without breaking the rest of the core? rr

Derick Rethans

19 years ago
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Reinis Rozitis wrote:
> Hello, > just a quick question - will the include_once() (Optimized require_once() and > include_once() by eliminating fopen(3) on second usage. (Dmitry)) optimisation > fix in 5.2.0 backported also in PHP 4 tree (in 4.4.5 maybe?)
No, no features will be back ported to PHP 4.4. regards, Derick

Reinis Rozitis

19 years ago
> No, no features will be back ported to PHP 4.4.
Although I dont see this as feature more like a fix (uneeded opens() stats() on each call) still thank you for the fast reply. p.s. lately the topics and discussions on internal list are pretty scarry.. starting with political issues and ending with memory manager flaws (besides also some phparchitect articles which propose/show 5.2 being faster in all generic tests still slower in realworld aplications).. which probably makes a lot (at least me) users uneasy about switching to the 5.2.x tree :) rr

Brian Moon

19 years ago
Reinis Rozitis wrote:
> p.s. lately the topics and discussions on internal list are pretty > scarry.. starting with political issues and ending with memory manager > flaws (besides also some phparchitect articles which propose/show 5.2 > being faster in all generic tests still slower in realworld > aplications).. which probably makes a lot (at least me) users uneasy > about switching to the 5.2.x tree :)
If you were using PHP 3, you could have made the same argument probably. Its not a perfect process. It gets ugly sometimes. But, IMO, it works better than one or two people having total control and say in how things are done.
-- Brian Moon ------------- http://dealnews.com/ It's good to be cheap =)