On 8/25/07 4:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> Here is a patch I am submitting as a recommendation to implement a
>> setcookie2() function to support the Set-Cookie2 response header
>> defined in RFC 2965.
>
> I think setcookie2 can ve useful, but a function with 13 arguments is a
> monster. Especially that you may not use all of them. Maybe it's better
> to have them as an array of secondary parameters?
Yep. Sara already suggested this to me, so I'm working on a new patch
for this.
Thanks!
--
Ben Ramsey
http://benramsey.com/