Re: ADT, SPL

php.internals

Sterling Hughes

23 years ago
ADT - probably not. SPL - I hope so. -Sterling On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 00:06, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> What's the status of ADT and SPL? Will they be part of the standard > PHP 5 distribution? > > -- > Sebastian Bergmann > http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ > > http://www.professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
-- "People can have the Model T in any colour -- so long as it's black." - Henry Ford

George Schlossnagle

23 years ago
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 12:00 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> ADT - probably not.
Why not part of ext? Enabled by default or not, it seems completely appropriate to ship them with php.
> SPL - I hope so.
ditto for SPL. George

Sterling Hughes

23 years ago
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 00:15, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 12:00 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > > ADT - probably not. > > Why not part of ext? Enabled by default or not, it seems completely > appropriate to ship them with php. >
cause its spaghetti code and it sucks.
> > SPL - I hope so. > > ditto for SPL. >
SPL should be integrated into the engine imho. I think its incredibly useful from a purely internals perspective. -Sterling
-- "Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs." - Henry Ford

Sebastian Bergmann

23 years ago
Sterling Hughes wrote:
> SPL should be integrated into the engine imho. I think its incredibly > useful from a purely internals perspective.
Either way I think the functionality should be part of PHP 5 and enabled by default.
-- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ http://www.professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/

(Marcus Börger)

23 years ago
Hello Sebastian, Monday, June 23, 2003, 8:50:17 AM, you wrote: SB> Sterling Hughes wrote:
>> SPL should be integrated into the engine imho. I think its incredibly >> useful from a purely internals perspective.
SB> Either way I think the functionality should be part of PHP 5 and SB> enabled by default. The facts: 1) SPL doesn't work when not being a built-in extension. 2) SPL opcode overloading slows down the engine a bit. Including the necessary parts into the engine would nearly reduce this effect to zero but increase SPL again speedwise.
-- Best regards, Marcus mailto:helly@php.net

George Schlossnagle

23 years ago
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 02:04 PM, Marcus BXrger wrote:
> 1) SPL doesn't work when not being a built-in extension.
Works fine for me. I tested all the interfaces except for spl_array_write_ex. gs -- George Schlossnagle -- Principal Consultant -- OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- +1.410.872.4910 x202 -- 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0

(Marcus Börger)

23 years ago
Hello George, Monday, June 23, 2003, 8:11:35 PM, you wrote: GS> On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 02:04 PM, Marcus BXrger wrote:
>> 1) SPL doesn't work when not being a built-in extension.
GS> Works fine for me. I tested all the interfaces except for GS> spl_array_write_ex. You could simply run the test suit which checks everything :-)
-- Best regards, Marcus mailto:helly@php.net