RFC: Compact Object Property Assignment

Project Governance

If you voted no, what was the main reason?

Overall Results

I voted yes!
I don’t find the feature useful
I don’t like the syntax
I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem
I prefer a narrower solution to this problem
This breaks backwards compatibility
This will have negative implications for future language evolution
This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain
I prefer not to say
I voted yes!
0 Votes (0%)
I don’t find the feature useful
25 Votes (71%)
I don’t like the syntax
3 Votes (9%)
I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem
6 Votes (17%)
I prefer a narrower solution to this problem
0 Votes (0%)
This breaks backwards compatibility
0 Votes (0%)
This will have negative implications for future language evolution
0 Votes (0%)
This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain
0 Votes (0%)
I prefer not to say
1 Votes (3%)

Voting Timeline

Dates based on UTC

Voting Breakdown

I voted yes!

0 Votes (0%)

I don’t like the syntax

3 Votes (9%)

I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem

6 Votes (17%)

I prefer a narrower solution to this problem

0 Votes (0%)

This breaks backwards compatibility

0 Votes (0%)

This will have negative implications for future language evolution

0 Votes (0%)

This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain

0 Votes (0%)

I prefer not to say

1 Votes (3%)

If you did not like the proposed syntax, which alternative would you prefer?

Overall Results

A (the proposed one)
B
C
D
E
F
Irrelevant
A (the proposed one)
0 Votes (0%)
B
1 Votes (3%)
C
0 Votes (0%)
D
0 Votes (0%)
E
0 Votes (0%)
F
0 Votes (0%)
Irrelevant
29 Votes (97%)

Voting Timeline

Dates based on UTC

Voting Breakdown

A (the proposed one)

0 Votes (0%)

B

1 Votes (3%)

C

0 Votes (0%)

D

0 Votes (0%)

E

0 Votes (0%)

F

0 Votes (0%)