If you voted no, what was the main reason?
Overall Results
I voted yes!
I don’t find the feature useful
I don’t like the syntax
I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem
I prefer a narrower solution to this problem
This breaks backwards compatibility
This will have negative implications for future language evolution
This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain
I prefer not to say
I voted yes!
0 Votes (0%)
I don’t find the feature useful
25 Votes (71%)
I don’t like the syntax
3 Votes (9%)
I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem
6 Votes (17%)
I prefer a narrower solution to this problem
0 Votes (0%)
This breaks backwards compatibility
0 Votes (0%)
This will have negative implications for future language evolution
0 Votes (0%)
This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain
0 Votes (0%)
I prefer not to say
1 Votes (3%)
Voting Timeline
Voting Breakdown
I voted yes!
0 Votes (0%)
I don’t find the feature useful
25 Votes (71%)
I don’t like the syntax
3 Votes (9%)
I prefer a more comprehensive solution to this problem
6 Votes (17%)
I prefer a narrower solution to this problem
0 Votes (0%)
This breaks backwards compatibility
0 Votes (0%)
This will have negative implications for future language evolution
0 Votes (0%)
This will be a nightmare to implement and maintain
0 Votes (0%)
I prefer not to say
1 Votes (3%)